Most popular ECU engine modules have been installed on Volkswagen, Skoda and Audi. BCM full. Coding and component information the for most Volkswagen, Audi, Skoda and SEAT electronic modules, Helps you to find coding for change, modify and retrofit it. List of the block installed on the popular models. Octavia vs A3. Which car is better? Compare Reviews, Price, Mileage, Features, Images, Colors and Detailed Specs Technical specs | Audi A4 Avant (B8) Estate 2012 is 1.6 cm longer and 9.5 cm lower compared to Skoda Octavia Scout (5E) Estate Crossover 2017. It has 4.2 cm less ground clearance and offers 18% less cargo space. 4,5. 470.3 cm. +1.6. Length. It DOES indeed use the torque sensing system called TorSen. A key, if not THE key differentiator pertaining to the TorSen Quattro application is that the torque transfer is "instantaneous." It is NOT reactionary -- TorSen as compared to Haldex, "binds (transfers torque) in real time." Haldex is quick, don't think that it is in some way a bad Technical specs | Skoda Octavia (NX) Estate 2019 is 10.3 cm longer and 4.1 cm higher compared to Audi A4 Avant (B7) Estate 2004. It has 3.6 cm more ground clearance and offers 44% more cargo space. 4,5. 468.9 cm. +10.3. Length. jawaban tebak gambar level 3 no 12. At first glance, one might think Audi’s used the name Sportback because it’s an estate-variant of the A3. In actual fact, Sportback is simply the name given to five-door models of the A3. Given that there’s been an increase in the length of the wheelbase, it now finds itself competing with other larger hatchbacks such as the Skoda Octavia. Those who buy on perceived value of the car’s badge alone will immediately find themselves demanding a test drive in the Audi, but we would say you might be discounting a rather good alternative by being so hasty. If you took time to sit back and look at the facts and figures, the prices, and importantly, what the experts say, you might realise it’s not quite a clear-cut a decision as you first thought. Don’t worry, we’ve done all this for you, and this head-to-head review should go some way to helping you determine whether the four rings are really the best option for you, or whether Skoda’s winged arrow hits the bullseye. Styling Okay, we need to be honest here – neither car is really going to make you ogle. The Sportback is criticised for looking so similar to the old model that it’s almost a challenge working out which one is which, whereas the Skoda is just unexciting. Those who are considering the Audi in the first place are likely to be seeking some class, and the Sportback does this in the typical, subtle Audi-like way. The grille is what draws your eye in, but there’s nothing else that’s particularly bold to keep it there. Once upon a time nobody would have dreamed of looking in a Skoda’s direction for something with class – it was firmly in the bargain-basement end of the market, perhaps unfairly. Skoda appears to have been taking notes from Audi in how to present class in a relatively unexciting way – the Octavia does have an upmarket look to it, even if it lacks any particular feature you are likely to remember after watching one go past. Interior and practicality The Audi A3 Sportback wades into this area armed quite heavily – its cabin is obviously similar to that of the three-door A3, and that cabin is one of the nicest places to sit at this end of the market. The Octavia, however, is a larger car, and although it might not quite live up to the Audi’s level of quality it has a more impressive load space. The extra two doors on the Sportback make it even easier to transport four adults – they don’t have to clamber in awkwardly – and the boot space has been improved from 350 litres to 380 litres over the three-door A3. Tall passengers have more legroom in the back, even if the front passengers are also tall, making it more suitable for long journeys with folk in the back. Just as it’s all looking sewn up for the Audi, the Octavia trundles onto the stage with a class-leading cabin in terms of spaciousness, and a whopping 590 litre boot. The quality of the Skoda’s interior materials is now good enough to be deemed by some reviewers as “Audi-like”, which is a very significant statement, and it’s clear the cabin has been designed for family use, because there are handy storage compartments aplenty. In fact, the only place the Octavia really falls down a bit on is rear visibility – it’s rather large and the rear pillars and large boot may make reverse-parking a little trickier than it would be in the Sportback. Throw the rear seats down and the boot space in the Octavia swells to a fairly silly 1,580 litres in the hatchback, or 1,740 for the estate. The A3 Sportback with the rear seats folded flat can only provide 1,220 litres, so the Skoda scores a massive win here. Driving You might be trying to work out where Skoda has made concessions in its budget when designing it, and it’s when the car is taken out onto the open road that it might become apparent. Skoda’s made a change to the rear suspension – changing it from a multi-link set-up to a torsion bar – and testers have found that the ride quality has been affected, calling it a bit jiggly. It certainly hasn’t been designed with pure driver engagement in mind, and the rest of the time the Octavia is quiet, refined and smooth, feeling safe to drive at speed and very grippy. Driver involvement is improved significantly if you go for the engaging vRS model, which has a more sophisticated (and sporty) suspension setup as well as a more powerful choice of engines. Critics found the Sportback equally unexciting, and unsurprisingly similar to the three-door A3’s behaviour on the open road. Grip is plentiful, especially if you opt for an all-wheel-drive (quattro, in Audi-speak) model, and the steering is weighted well but there is a distinct absence of feedback. Some also said the ride in the Sportback was slightly better than in the three-door A3, possibly because it’s been set-up a little softer due to being aimed at families, but this ride is compromised by larger wheels. Engines As with most cars in the Volkswagen Group, engine choice is nearly identical between the two cars – in both cases testers recommend the mid-range diesel for those doing higher mileages and the turbo for those who stay more local. One engine to avoid on both the Sportback and the Octavia is the turbocharged TFSI petrol engine, it seems to be the least refined and doesn’t work very well with the gearboxes available in the A3. However, the bulk of petrol sales will be made up of the turbo – 120hp in the A3 Sportback and 138hp in the Octavia – and the diesel sales from the that has just under 150hp in both cases and is capable of the mid to high 60s. Those looking for squeaky-clean economy will find the Octavia’s Greenline TDI very tempting, because it’s capable of 88mpg (theoretically) and is free to tax. The diesel in the Sportback is also free to tax and can do over 70mpg, but more eyes are on a plug-in hybrid variant of the A3 Sportback called e-tron, with over 200hp and promises of around 188mpg. Value for money and running costs Skodas are no longer as cheap as they once were, but value for money continues to be one of the Octavia’s biggest strengths. The Sportback – well, it may be rather more expensive, but some would point out it has the image to carry it off. Let’s look at what you get if you spend the minimum amount on each car. With the Octavia you would be parting with around £16,300 for the TSI petrol in “S” spec. A basic Octavia leaves the factory with a staggering £5,000 worth of additional kit compared with the previous model on a like-for-like basis, so even in “S” spec you are well accommodated, and the engine pleasantly surprised most experts who drove it – 55+mpg is good going, and it’s not fast but can keep up with traffic. For just over £19,000, you get an A3 Sportback with the same turbocharged engine, in “SE” spec – it’s also decently equipped but it doesn’t exceed Skoda’s level of generosity by enough to really justify the additional £3,000. When comparing better equipped and more desirable models, the differences are still quite stark – an Octavia TDI in SE Business spec is around £20,500 and an A3 Sportback TDI SE Technik is over £23,500. Once upon a time running costs and residuals may have given the Audi’s premium price some support but the Skoda matches Audi across the range – except for the e-tron model which is £8,000 or so more expensive than the priciest Octavia – and the diesel Skodas promise to hold value just as well as the Audi nowadays. Verdict There is just point in it when you consider the wowscores (the average score carwow generates for each new car, based on critics’ reviews) – the Skoda having the tiny advantage. There’s clearly very little to separate either car on running costs and performance, and both cars are competent, comfortable transporters of people and luggage – although the Skoda’s larger body allows it to accommodate far more luggage than the Sportback. When you consider the fact the Skoda is cheaper than the Audi across nearly the entire range, what could you say it has going against it? We’d say the badge – unfortunately there are people out there who still remember Skoda jokes and don’t realise just how significantly Skoda has turned its image around. We think that the Sportback is certainly worth considering if you feel that the Skoda is just a little on the large and awkward side, although you get parking sensors as standard on all but the lowest spec Octavia, so you’d have to be pretty adverse to bigger cars to justify that. When all’s said and done we find it hard to recommend the Sportback over the Octavia, because it boils down to how much it all costs. It’s as practical, as comfortable, just as solid, built to the same high quality standard as the Audi, and you are able to get it all by paying less. You now have permission to eat your cake. Preţ: 300 lei Adaugă la favorite Adăugat la favorite Produs nou Vândut de firmă Cu garanție ID #1600905647 Panou de filtrare (cartus)Descriere tehnicaK & N filtru de aer - cartuş (VW / Audi / SEAT / SKODA GOLF V / ALTEA / Octavia II tdi/ Actualizat acum 17 zile 89 vizualizări Detalii tehnice Livrare și plată Garanție: DA Retur: DA Piesă auto compatibilă cu: Audi A3 8P Audi Q3 Audi A4 B8 Seat Leon Seat Toledo Audi A4 B6 Audi A4 B7 Volkswagen Passat B6 Volkswagen Passat B7 Volkswagen Passat B8 Seat Altea Skoda Octavia Volkswagen Golf 5 Skoda Octavia 2 Seat Leon 3 Which should you choose between the Volkswagen Passat and the Skoda Octavia? It can be a tricky decision to make, because both cars are comfortable, capable family haulers. This guide will walk you through the key differences between these cars, and by the end you’ll know which is best for you. Keep in mind that, if you decide that the Volkswagen Passat is the car for you, then you’ll have to go used because it is no longer available new. Styling It’s hard to deny that the Passat’s long, sleek shape looks handsome, and it’s just as tidy close up. Details like the line that runs through the grille into the intricate headlights give the impression of a car priced much higher than it was when new. The crease that runs along the car’s flanks and door handles certainly adds to its handsome look. Being a newer model, the Skoda is the more modern looking of the duo. It’s still fairly conservative, however the pointy headlights and wide grille give it a slightly more aggressive look. If you want a sportier vibe, you can get the Octavia as a hot vRS model, which gets you deeper front and rear bumpers and some side skirts. Interior The Volkswagen Passat certainly has a high quality interior with plenty of soft touch materials and shiny trims, however the design is starting to show its age. At least everything is logically laid out and easy to use, and you get plenty of interior space. Rear passengers will have loads of head and leg room, and the boot’s a decent size as well. The saloon boot opening does make it slightly harder to load, although an estate version is also available. The Octavia also offers ample interior space, and the hatchback body shell only adds to the practicality. As for the design, it’s more interesting than the Passat’s cabin. The freestanding touchscreen and digital drivers display look good, however material quality isn’t quite up to the Passat’s standards. The touch-sensitive controls throughout aren’t as easy to use either. The Octavia was recently overhauled, and it shows once you step inside Driving While the Passat is never going to be the car of choice for thrill seekers, its handling balance is composed and confidence-inspiring. More than anything else, it receives strong praise from critics for the ride quality. Particularly on the smaller wheel sizes of entry-level models, it suppresses rough roads and large bumps with aplomb, while road and wind noise are impressively suppressed. The Octavia rides fairly well too, if not with quite the same level of control as the Volkswagen. Very bumpy roads unsettle the rear of the car slightly, which translates into a marginally less comfy ride and a less controlled feel when cornering. If you go for the hot vRS model, it handles well on a twisty road and offers hot-hatch performance, whilst still being a great long distance cruiser. Engine Comparing models at equivalent prices starts to reveal some larger differences between the two cars. The most basic Passat is fitted with a turbo diesel unit. The 120hp engine is smooth and refined and, when driven carefully, should return around 70mpg. You can also have a diesel with 150hp and a petrol with 150hp. The entry-level Skoda Octavia gets a turbo petrol engine with 110hp. This will return a claimed 55mpg, however it can feel underpowered on the motorway. Step up to the turbo petrol and you get a healthy 150hp but you’ll also still get 53mpg. A diesel is also available, as is a petrol plug-in hybrid. Value for money For an entry-level model, the Passat’s kit list is fairly generous. In S spec, buyers are treated to 16-inch alloy wheels, Bluetooth connectivity and a touchscreen infotainment system as standard. Entry level Octavia models some with automatic wipers and lights, rear parking sensors and dual-zone climate control. Step up to SE L trim and you get keyless entry and start, adaptive cruise control and 17-inch alloy wheels. It isn’t really possible to spec the Passat to the same level, but even adding sat nav – one of the more desirable options – adds at least £675 to the price list. You’d even have to fork out an extra £85 for carpet mats, which are standard in the Skoda. As for price, the Volkswagen Passat is only available second-hand these days with prices starting from around £15,000 for a 2017 SE model with 15,000 miles on the clock, and rising as high as £27,000 for a 2021 R Line with 1,000 miles. The Octavia is available new, with prices starting at £23,335 for the SE, rising to £27,475 for the SE L. If you want the hot vRS model, then that starts £33,630. Safety and reliability When the Volkswagen Passat was last tested by Euro NCAP in 2014, it scored the maximum five star safety rating. However, it hasn’t been tested under the new NCAP safety testing regulations. The Skoda Octavia has been tested under the new standards, and it was awarded five stars. As for reliability, there are no horror stories to report with either of these cars. If you buy a used Passat which is under three years old, you’ll still have some of the three year warranty left. If you buy an approved used Passat from a VW dealer, you’ll also get a two-year warranty for added peace of mind. All new Skoda models also get a three year warranty, with unlimited mileage for the first two years and 60,000 miles in the third year. Verdict Picking a winner depends on where your priorities lie. The Passat has a better ride, is more refined, slightly roomier inside and offers levels of quality the Octavia can’t compete with. For many buyers, however, the smaller engine and the more limited standard equipment might just swing the decision in the Octavia’s favour. Besides the more powerful engine and more comprehensive equipment list, the Octavia has plenty to be commended on. With the exception of the Passat, it’s one of the most practical and comfortable family cars on sale. You get more for your money with the Octavia but you get an overall more desirable car with the Passat. Save money on the Volkswagen Passat and Skoda Octavia Once you’ve decided which car is right for you, head over to carwow to get the best deals. You can find a quality used Volkswagen Passat for a great price, or get offers on a new Skoda Octavia. It’s as easy as configuring your ideal model, sitting back and waiting for our trusted dealers to come back to you with their best offers. You can also sell your car through carwow, and it’s just as easy. Upload a few pictures, answer a few questions and our trusted dealers will offer you the best price for your car, and even come and collect it at a time to suit you. HOME page / compare / Audi A4 S4 Avant TFSI Quattro vs Škoda Octavia Combi TSI RS Compare two cars 2011. - 2015. D - Large family car wagon, 5 door 4 x 4 Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2013. - 2016. D - Large family car wagon, 5 door front Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2011 Audi A4 S4 Avant 2013 Škoda Octavia Combi © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Petrol 6 - V config, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Petrol 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Two significantly similar cars, no doubt about that. Still, each one has something different to offer. Having both cars powered by petrol engines and utilizing the 5-door wagon body style within the same 'Large family car' segment, the only major difference here really is their wheel drive configuration (4 x 4 for the Audi and front in the case of the Škoda). Both the engines are Volkswagen-engineered . The first one has a 6-cylinder, 24-valves 333hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 220hp one. Safety A starting point here would be to take a look at the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests which were performed on both of the cars, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. Still, apart from the official crash test results there are other things we need to be aware of. Both vehicles belong to the large family car segment, which is generally a good thing safety-wise, but it doesn't do much to help us decide between the two. Furthermore, if we'd like to consider vehicle mass in this context too, which we definitely should, the German car offers a considerable difference of 26% more metal. Reliability I don't like generalizing things when it comes to reliability, although it does seem that Škoda as a brand displays somewhat better results, at least on all of the models level. These are the official statistics, while our visitors describe reliability of Audi with an average rating of and models under the Škoda badge with out of 5. Some independent research have also placed A4 as average reliability-wise, and Octavia is more or less at the same apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as the German car rank it on average as while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets out of 5. Performance & Fuel economy Audi is undoubtly more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 250 kilometers per hour, 6km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy an obvious choice would be the Czech car, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (46 mpg), in combined cycle. That's 35% difference compared to the German car! Verdict Audi appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the German car offers significantly better overall protection, taking the lead here. It all continues in the same direction, with Audi being considerably quicker, thus putting more smile on driver's face. It does come at a cost though, and that's the fuel consumption... No mistake, whatever you decide here, but I'd still go for the Škoda. Nevertheless, let's not forget that people have different preferences and needs, so what really counts is your personal feel. I'm only here to help. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, among thousands of similar, yet so different vehicles. Check a car by its VIN number Technical Specification Brake System Front Brake Type Disc Disc Disc Rear Brake Type Disc Disc Disc Dimensions Wheel Base 2680 Mm 2819 Mm 2851 Mm Overall Width 1829 Mm 1847 Mm 1827 Mm Overall Length 4689 Mm 4762 Mm 4713 Mm Overall Height 1469 Mm 1433 Mm 1440 Mm Ground Clearance 137 Mm N/A N/A Kerb Weight 1430 1550 N/A Saddle Height N/A N/A N/A Engine Displacement 1984 Cc 1984 Cc 2998 Cc Fuel Efficiency Kmpl N/A Kmpl Engine Type TSI Turbocharged I4 N/A B58 Turbocharged I6 Valves Per Cylinder 4 4 4 Valve Configuration Valvetrain N/A N/A DOHC Fuel Supply System N/A N/A N/A Maximum Power 188 Bhp @ 4180 Rpm 188 Bhp @ 4200 Rpm 382 Bhp @ 5800 Rpm Maximum Torque 320 Nm @ 1500 Rpm 320 Nm @ 1450 Rpm 500 Nm @ 1850 Rpm Turbocharger Turbocharger Turbocharger Turbocharger Maintenance Warranty Time 4 Years 2 Years 2 Years Warranty Distance 10000 Kms N/A Unlimited Kms Steering Steering Type Power Assisted (Electric) Power Assisted (Electric) Power Assisted (Electric) Steering Gear Type N/A N/A Rack & Pinion Steering Column N/A N/A Adjustable Min Turning Radius N/A Suspension Rear Suspension Multilink Suspension Multi-link Suspension With Stabilizer Bar And Coil Springs Five Arm Multi Link Suspension Front Suspension MacPherson Suspension Multi-link Suspension With Stabilizer Bar And Coil Springs Dual Link Strut Transmission No Of Gears 7 7 Automatic (Torque Converter) - 8 Gears, Manual Override & Paddle Shift, Sport Mode Wheels & Tyres Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless Tubeless Wheel Size 17 Inch 17 Inch 18 Inch Rear Tyre 205 / 55 R17 225 / 50 R17 225 / 45 R18 Front Tyre 205 / 55 R17 225 / 50 R17 225 / 45 R18 Four Wheel Drive N/A N/A N/A Alloy Wheel Alloy Wheel Alloy Wheel Alloy Wheel Basic Facts Overview Exterior Color Brilliant Silver,Maple Brown,Candy White,Magic Black,Lava Blue Mythos Black,Floret Silver,Terra Grey,Ibis White Portimao Blue Metallic,Brown,Tanzanite Blue Metallic,Dravit Grey Metallic,Black,White,Sunset Orange metallic,Blue,Mediterranean Blue Metallic,Black Sapphire Metallic,Mineral Grey Metallic,Alpine White,Other Interior Color Grey Grey Grey Fuel Type Petrol Petrol Petrol Transmission Type Automatic Automatic Automatic Body Type Sedan Sedan Sedan Group Body Type Sedan Sedan Sedan Fuel Tank Capacity 50 54 59 Ncap Safety Ratings N/A N/A N/A Options & Features Instrumentation Clock Digital Digital Digital Door Ajar Warning Yes Yes Yes Distance To Empty Yes Yes Yes Average Speed Yes Yes Yes Average Fuel Consumption Yes Yes Yes Seat Belt Warning Yes Yes Yes Exterior Design Details No Of Airbags 6 8 6 Airbags (Driver, Passenger, 2 Curtain, Driver Side, Front Passenger Side) Front Headlamps Drls LED LED N/A Fog Lamps Fog Lamps Fog Lamps Fog Lamps Equipment List on Board Music Touch Screen N/A Music/ Touch Screen N/A Usb Port Aux USB Port/AUX USB Port/AUX USB Port/AUX Connected Technology N/A N/A N/A Options Seats Head-Rests,Driver Armrest,Folding Rear Seat,Lumbar Support,Driver Height Adjustable Seat,Front Seat Pockets Head-Rests,Rear Armrest,Driver Armrest,Front Seat Pockets Adjustable Head-Rests,Head-Rests,Driver Armrest,Folding Rear Seat,Lumbar Support,Driver Height Adjustable Seat,Front Seat Pockets Doors And Windows Door Pockets Door Pockets,Remote Trunk Opener Door Pockets Safety Child Lock ,Side Impact Beams,Passenger Side Rear View Mirror,Day & Night Rear View Mirror,Side Airbag - Rear,Engine Check Warning,Side Airbag - Front,Seat belt,Passenger Airbag,Hill Hold,Co-Driver Airbag,Central Locking,Driver Airbag,Parking Brakes,Brake Assist,Anti-Lock Braking System,Tyre Pressure Monitor,Electronic Stability Control Child Lock ,Side Impact Beams,Passenger Side Rear View Mirror,Side Airbag - Rear,Engine Check Warning,Side Airbag - Front,Seat belt,Passenger Airbag,Hill Hold,Co-Driver Airbag,Central Locking,Driver Airbag,Parking Brakes,Brake Assist,Anti-Lock Braking System,Tyre Pressure Monitor,Electronic Stability Control Rear Seat Belts,Emergency Exit,Child Lock ,Side Impact Beams,Passenger Side Rear View Mirror,Day & Night Rear View Mirror,Front Impact Beams,Side Airbag - Rear,Engine Check Warning,Side Airbag - Front,Seat belt,Passenger Airbag,Co-Driver Airbag,Central Locking,Driver Airbag,Parking Brakes,Brake Assist,Anti-Lock Braking System,Tyre Pressure Monitor Roof And Glass N/A Sun Roof Panoramic Roof Cmp Feature Alloy wheels,Navigation System,AM/FM Radio,Stereo System,Bluetooth Alloy wheels,Navigation System,AM/FM Radio,Stereo System,Bluetooth Alloy wheels,Navigation System,AM/FM Radio,Bluetooth Middle Rear Head Rest N/A N/A N/A Child Seat Anchor Points Child Seat Anchor Points Child Seat Anchor Points N/A Comfort & Convenience Vanity Mirrors On Sun Visors Yes Yes No Steering Adjustment Yes Yes Yes Remote Fuel Lid Opener No Yes No Rear Seat Centre Arm Rest Yes No No Rear Reading Lamp Yes Yes Yes Rear View Camera Yes Yes Yes Air Quality Control Yes No No Cruise Control Yes Yes Yes Headlight Off And Lgnition Key Off Reminder Yes Yes Yes Automatic Climate Control Yes Yes No 12v Power Outlets No Yes Yes Adjustable Seats Yes Yes Yes Cigarette Lighter No No No Cup Holders Front Yes Yes Yes Cup Holders Rear Yes Yes Yes Rear Ac Vents Yes Yes Yes Heated Rear Seats No No No Power Door Locks No Yes Yes Power Windows Rear Yes Yes Yes Power Windows Front Yes Yes Yes Parking Sensor Yes Yes Yes Multi Function Steering Wheel Yes No Yes Low Fuel Warning Light Yes Yes Yes Heated Front Seat No No No Power Steering Yes Yes Yes

audi a4 b8 vs skoda octavia 3