jeebowhite. True Ford Enthusiast. 23.8k. Name: James. Ford Model: Sea Grey Mondeo MKIV 1.8TDCi 140ps Zetec. Ford Year: 2007. UK/Ireland Location: Kent. Posted May 12, 2013. qashi to kuga is the easiest move, its near enough the same in Shell and driveability. the C Max is an MPV big Focus and I have the MK1 which is many miles away fromm the Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 14 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm higher. Trunk capacity: 456 litres: 200 litres: Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down: 1653 litres: no data: Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga has 256 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. Turning Side View Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2012 vs. Ford C-Max (DXA) Minivan 2010 Technical specs | Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2012 is 14.4 cm longer and 7.6 cm higher compared to Ford C-Max (DXA) Minivan 2010. It has 6.1 cm more ground clearance and offers 5% less cargo space. 4,5 Πιο προσιτό το Qashqai, πιο πλούσιο και με καλύτερη εγγύηση το Kuga. Με τιμή που ξεκινάει από τα 26.990 ευρώ, το Nissan Qashqai είναι πιο προσιτό, ωστόσο στη βασική του έκδοση Elite, παρόλο που έχει μια Front View Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 vs. Ford C-Max (DM2) Minivan 2003 Technical specs | Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 is 5.8 cm wider and 6 cm higher compared to Ford C-Max (DM2) Minivan 2003. It offers 6% less cargo space. 4,5 jawaban tebak gambar level 3 no 12. Compare two cars 2009. - 2013. M - MPV MPV, 5 door front Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2010. - 2015. M - MPV MPV, 5 door front Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2009 Peugeot 3008 2010 Ford C-Max © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Diesel 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Diesel 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the mpv segment and utilize the same 5-door MPV body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific diesel engine choice they offer. Both the engines are Peugeot-engineered . The first one has a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 110hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 114hp one. Safety A starting point here would be to take a look at the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests which were performed on both of the cars, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. Moving further on, let's take a closer look at some additional safety-related facts. Both vehicles belong to the mpv segment, which is generally a good thing safety-wise, but that fact doesn't break the tie between the two cars. Furthermore, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, the French car offers a marginal difference of 9% more metal. Reliability Reliability is not the best thing to consider on the make level, but it is worth mentioning that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, at least on all of the models level. These are the official statistics, while our visitors describe reliability of Peugeot with an average rating of and models under the Ford badge with out of 5. The same official information place 3008 as average reliability-wise, and C-Max is more or less at the same should definitely mention that owners of cars with the same powertrain as the French car rank it on average as out of 5, exactly the same as the other one. Performance & Fuel economy Ford is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 184 kilometers per hour, 4km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy the winner has to be the American car, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (64 mpg), in combined cycle. We can't ignore that 16% difference compared to the French car. Verdict Peugeot appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the French car offers slightly better overall protection and takes the lead. From there things take a different direction, with Ford offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. To make things even better, it consumps less fuel! It's not difficult to say then that if I'd need to make a choice, it would definitely be the Ford. In any case that's my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you'll find my guidelines useful in the process. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, among thousands of similar, yet so different vehicles. Check a car by its VIN number Skip to ContentSkip to FooterFord hopes to muscle in on the compact SUV class with its facelifted Kuga. How does it fare against VW Tiguan and Mazda CX-5?4 Mar 2017Ford is currently in the middle of a big product push, with new models coming thick and fast. From SUVs to city cars and everything in between, the firm is trying to fill every gap in the market. The latest addition to the line-up is the new Kuga, which is a heavy reworking of the second-generation bolder looks, a range of revised engines and a refreshed model range, the newcomer is ready to wade into battle in the evolving and increasingly competitive compact SUV class. This sector comprises a host of talented choices, including the recently launched Volkswagen Tiguan. Boasting a mixture of premium appeal, impressive practicality and cutting-edge kit, the rugged German machine presents a stern challenge.• Best crossovers on sale right nowSo does the Mazda CX-5. It’s the oldest model here and soon to be replaced, but is still on top of its game. The CX-5 has sharp handling, handsome looks, a classy cabin and plenty of standard equipment, and delivers strong driver and showroom appeal. Ford Kuga Model:Ford Kuga TDCi ST-LinePrice:£31,795Engine: 4cyl turbodiesel, 178bhp 0-60mph: seconds Test economy: CO2: 134g/km Annual road tax:£130The latest Ford Kuga is an update of the second-generation model that made its debut in 2012. Featuring refreshed looks, a tweaked interior, revised engines and a rejigged trim line-up, the newcomer aims to give the brand a bigger slice of the lucrative compact SUV a choice of two and four-wheel drive, plus the option of petrols and diesels. There’s also a larger TDCi in two states of tune, and we test the more powerful 178bhp AWD auto here. The car costs £31,795 in new ST-Line 178bhp is nearly 10bhp down on the VW’s engine, so it was a surprise to find that the newcomer matched its rival from 0-60mph, with a brisk time of seconds. However, the Ford wasn’t able to disguise its chunky 1,716kg kerbweight as effectively during our in-gear tests, where it trailed both the seven-speed Tiguan and torquey reviews On the road, however, this shortfall is negligible. The Kuga’s TDCi engine is remarkably refined, only becoming intrusive when worked hard – although with a useful 400Nm at 2,000rpm, you rarely have to extend the unit to make quick impressive is the PowerShift gearbox. The six-speed unit delivers smooth and rapid shifts when cruising, but at low speed it trips over itself and struggles to find the right gear. On the plus side, there are now handy gearshift paddles instead of the old car’s tiny, lever-mounted rocker as before, the Kuga delivers taut handling. There’s plenty of grip, while the torque vectoring system helps keep the car locked on your chosen line. As with the Mazda, the steering is well weighted, plus the stiffened sports suspension delivers decent body trade-off for this agility is the firmest ride on test. The Kuga settles down at speed, but around town it follows bumps and potholes. Head for the rough stuff and the Ford is the least capable choice. Its all-wheel-drive system sends torque to the axle with most grip, but there are no off-road aids such as a centre differential lock or hill descent control. Testers’ notes: “The Kuga is available in luxurious Vignale guise. Featuring a bespoke bodykit, special leather seat trim and dedicated dealers, this flagship model starts at £30,445.” Volkswagen TiguanModel:VW Tiguan TDI SE NavPrice:£33,115Engine: 4cyl turbodiesel, 187bhp 0-60mph: secondsTest economy: road tax:£145This second-generation Tiguan hit showrooms last year, and represented a step upmarket for Volkswagen’s compact already sampled the entry-level two-wheel-drive diesel variant, so now it’s the turn of the flagship 187bhp diesel, which is paired with the firm’s 4MOTION all-wheel-drive transmission and seven-speed DSG gearbox. We sample it in popular £33,115 SE Nav guise – although the car in our pictures is a racy £37,005 187bhp, the VW’s diesel is the most powerful unit on test – although its 400Nm torque figure is 20Nm down on the Mazda’s. In combination with the car’s four-wheel-drive traction and launch control, it accelerated from 0-60mph in a brisk seconds, matching the lighter Kuga and surging a full second ahead of the seven-speed transmission’s shorter, more closely stacked ratios gave the VW an advantage during our in-gear tests, where it was consistently faster. Only in its overdrive seventh gear does the Tiguan feel sluggish, which was reflected in its leisurely 50-70mph the Tiguan is based on the same platform as the Golf, it’s no surprise it drives with the same reassuring composure. It’s not as engaging as the Mazda, but it boasts more grip and benefits from direct and naturally-weighted steering. Our test car was also fitted with the £810 Dynamic Chassis Control adaptive dampers, which in their sportiest setting deliver tauter body the biggest benefit is the improvement in ride quality over the standard set-up. Most of the time, the VW soaks up bumps with a soft-edged plushness. VW’s 4MOTION all-wheel-drive system features an Off-Road setting that tunes the traction control for maximum grip, but the lack of ground clearance and the use of summer tyres mean you won’t want to venture too far off the beaten VW also leads when it comes to refinement, with good suppression of both wind and engine noise. It’s particularly hushed at 70mph, where our sound meter revealed it was the quietest car notes: “VW’s scalable platform means you’ll soon be able to get your hands on a seven-seat Tiguan. Set to be called the Tiguan Allspace, the newcomer is 215mm longer.”Mazda CX-5 Model:Mazda CX-5 D Sport NavPrice:£31,195Engine: 4cyl turbodiesel, 173bhp 0-60mph: secondsTest economy: CO2:144g/kmAnnual road tax:£145The Mazda CX-5 is one of the sharpest-handling crossovers on sale, whichever version you go for. A recent facelift has helped keep the rest of the car fresh, plus it’s added a sheen of premium appeal. Here we test the flagship £31,195 D Sport Nav Auto version – although the car in our pictures has a manual diesel delivers 420Nm of torque, which is 20Nm more than both the Ford and VW. The car is also nearly 100kg lighter than its rivals here, tipping the scales at 1, at the track its performance was hobbled by its automatic transmission, which didn’t lock up quickly enough off the line to make full use of the CX-5’s muscle advantage. The Mazda put in a stronger display during our in-gear tests, where it was faster than the Ford and closely matched with the the real world, the CX-5 actually feels the most responsive car of this trio, with its smooth and eager powerplant pulling strongly from 1,400rpm and revving through to the 5,000rpm red line with a petrol-like enthusiasm. And while the automatic box doesn’t change gear anywhere near as quickly as its rivals’ twin-clutch units, its shifts are smooth and it responds promptly to the steering is accurate and well weighted, and the suspension controls the body through bends. And while there’s not as much grip as in the Ford and VW, the Mazda’s controls deliver more while the CX-5 is reasonable over uneven tarmac, it does tend to fidget and move around, thanks to its stiff springs; it can’t match the VW, with its adaptive dampers, for comfort. Road noise is ever-present, too, due to the low-profile tyres and the car’s relative lack of soundproofing. As a result, it’s the noisiest car here at our other contenders, the Mazda shouldn’t be considered for serious off-road use. As with the Ford, it moves torque automatically to the axle with the most grip, but that’s about it for rough-road aids. Testers’ notes: “The Mazda is available in both four and front-wheel drive. Go for the latter with the 148bhp diesel and six-speed manual gearbox, and emissions drop to 119g/km.”Verdict First place: Volkswagen TiguanThe Tiguan isn’t the most exciting SUV, but its compelling blend of practicality, premium appeal, composed driving dynamics and reasonable running costs gives it the edge over its rivals here. It’s backed up by the most sophisticated four-wheel-drive system and slickest gearbox. We’d recommend ticking the box for adaptive dampers and going for SE L trim if you can. Second place: Mazda CX-5Even though it’s due to be replaced soon, the CX-5 still runs the Tiguan close for victory. It’s not as spacious or refined, but it’s more fun to drive, and its engine delivers strong real-world pace and efficiency. Factor in its lower list price and long list of kit, and the Mazda still makes a fine choice for buyers wanting a handsome and great-value SUV. Third place: Ford KugaThe updates have kept the Kuga looking fresh, while the revised trim line-up gives buyers greater choice. As before, the Ford delivers sharp driving dynamics, plus there’s a welcome boost in refinement. Business users will also like the reasonably low emissions. But in such a competitive class, the Kuga’s practicality shortfall, lack of kit and firm ride are harder to overlook. Is it worth waiting for…New Mazda CX-5Due: Summer Price: From £25kEngine: 4cyl, 173bhpThe boldly styled new Mazda CX-5 promises more premium appeal and cutting-edge kit, while a slightly bigger platform will boost space. Mazda is also claiming big gains in refinement, and SkyActiv tech should mix strong pace and VW Tiguan TDI SE Nav DSGMazda CX-5 D 175 Sport Nav Ford Kuga TDCi ST-LineOn-the-road price/total as tested£33,115/£33,115£31,195/£31,195£31,795/£32,640Residual value (after 3yrs/30,000)£14,637/ tax liability std/higher rate£1,867/£3,734£1,674/£3,348£1,644/£3,287Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles)£1,774/£2,957£1,906/£3,177£1,848/£3,080Ins. group/quote/road tax band/cost20/£644/F/£14521/£509/F/£14525/£747/E/£130Servicing costs£288 (variable)£711 (3yrs/36k)£390 (2yrs/20,000) Length/wheelbase4,486/2,677mm4,555/2,700mm4,541/2,690mmHeight/width1,673/1,839mm1,710/1,840mm1,694/1,856mmEngine4cyl in/1,968cc4cyl in-line/2,191cc4cyl in-line/1,997ccPeak power 187/3,500 bhp/rpm173/4,500 bhp/rpm178/3,500 bhp/rpmPeak torque 400/1,900 Nm/rpm420/2,000 Nm/rpm400/2,000 Nm/rpmTransmission 7-spd auto/4wd6-spd auto/4wd6-spd auto/4wdFuel tank capacity/spare wheel60 litres/foam58 litres/foam60 litres/foamBoot capacity (seats up/down) 615/1,655 litres503/1,620 litres456/1,603 litresKerbweight/payload/towing weight1,723/472/2,200kg1,628/497/2,000kg1,716/514/2,100kgTurning circle/drag metresBasic warranty (miles)/recovery3yrs (60,000)/1yr3yrs (60,000)/3yrs3yrs (60,000)/1yrService intervals/UK dealersVariable (1yr)/22312,500 (1yr)/15412,500 (1yr)/781Driver Power manufacturer/dealer Adult/child/ped./assist/stars96/84/72/68/5 (2016)94/87/64/86/5 (2012)N/A 0-60/ secs30-50mph in 3rd/4th secs50-70mph in 5th/6th/7th secs/N/ secs/N/ATop speed/rpm at 70mph 131mph/1,800rpm127mph/2,100rpm124mph/2,000rpmBraking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph levels outside/idle/30/70mph70/46/62/68dB73/56/62/72dB68/44/61/70dBAuto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/ milesGovt urban/extra-urban/combined urban/extra-urban/combined CO2/tax bracket201/149g/km/29%216/144g/km/27%210/134g/km/26% Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/cameraSeven/yes/yes/£300Six/yes/yes/yesSix/yes/yes/£250Auto box/stability/cruise control/AEBYes/yes/yes/£280Yes/yes/yes/yesYes/yes/yes/£200Climate control/leather/heated seatsYes/£1,785/£280Yes/yes/yesYes/no/£345Metallic paint/LED lights/keyless go£570/£1,375/£380£560/LED/yes£545/£1,125*/£250Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/BluetoothYes/yes/yes/yesYes/yes/yes/yesYes/yes/yes/yesNext StepsMost PopularNew MG 4 prototype reviewRoad testsNew MG 4 prototype reviewWe try out the new all-electric MG4 ahead of its arrival in the UK25 Jul 2022New MINI Aceman concept points to 2024 electric MINI crossoverNewsNew MINI Aceman concept points to 2024 electric MINI crossoverNew small MINI electric crossover is due in a few years, and this concept gives a very strong hint of what the production-ready MINI Aceman could look…26 Jul 2022Toyota bZ4X vs Volkswagen vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: 2022 group test reviewCar group testsToyota bZ4X vs Volkswagen vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: 2022 group test reviewDoes Toyota’s all-new bZ4X electric SUV crack the family-friendly formula? We compare it to Hyundai and VW rivals23 Jul 2022Skip to HeaderSkip to Content Bringing car spotting into perspective Real height1 m 2 + cm 1 m Real height1 + cm 2 m Real width2 1 m Real width2 Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer. Rear ViewFord C-Max (DM2) Minivan 2003 vs. Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2012 Technical specs | Ford C-Max (DM2) Minivan 2003 is cm narrower and cm lower compared to Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2012. It offers 2% less cargo 1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Max. ground clearance | 4. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 5. With rear seats folded down Quick Facts 721801 Comparison combinations Germany Origin of the most car models 1908 Year of our oldest car model Bringing car spotting into perspective Real height1 m 2 + cm 1 m Real height1 + cm 2 m Real length Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer. Side ViewFord C-Max (DXA) Minivan 2010 vs. Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2017 Technical specs | Ford C-Max (DXA) Minivan 2010 is cm shorter and cm lower compared to Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2017. It offers 5% more cargo 1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Max. ground clearance | 4. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 5. With rear seats folded down Quick Facts 721801 Comparison combinations Germany Origin of the most car models 1908 Year of our oldest car model Versión Selecciona un concesionario Selecciona un concesionario Precio € Precio Precio € Habitabilidad 4 Habitabilidad Habitabilidad 4 Estilo SUV Estilo Estilo Monovolumen Puertas 5 Puertas Puertas 5 Plazas 5 Plazas Plazas 5 Tracción Tracción delantera Tracción Tracción Tracción delantera Largo 461,4 cm Largo Largo 437,9 cm Ancho 188,3 cm Ancho Ancho 182,8 cm Alto 167,8 cm Alto Alto 161,0 cm Peso en vacío kg Peso en vacío Peso en vacío kg Maletero 456 l Maletero Maletero 471 l Cilindrada cm³ Cilindrada Cilindrada 998 cm³ Potencia 150 CV Potencia Potencia 100 CV Par máximo 240 Nm Par máximo Par máximo 170 Nm Velocidad punta 195 km/h Velocidad punta Velocidad punta 174 km/h Aceleración 9,7 s (0-100 km/h) Aceleración Aceleración 12,6 s (0-100 km/h) Homologación 00332065 Homologación Homologación 00332065 Emisiones CO2 129 g/km Emisiones CO2 Emisiones CO2 127 g/km Consumo Urbano 6,5 l/100 km Consumo Urbano Consumo Urbano 6,2 l/100 km Consumo Extraurbano 4,9 l/100 km Consumo Extraurbano Consumo Extraurbano 4,5 l/100 km Consumo Combinado 5,5 l/100 km Consumo Combinado Consumo Combinado 5,1 l/100 km

ford kuga vs c max